Socio-Economic Stability and Sustainable Development in the Post-COVID Era: Lessons for the Business and Economic Leaders

This paper focuses on social and economic stability, as well as sustainable development, in the post-COVID era in light of the recent theoretical approaches and leadership practices. As governments worldwide resorted to repeated national- and regional-specific impositions of social and economic isolation in an (often failed) attempt to contain the spread of the coronavirus, their economies have been plunged into recessions, which have been deeper than those associated with the global financial crisis in the past. Successful business and economic leaders need to be aware of the dominant trends unfolding as the COVID-19 pandemic is gradually coming to its end and the New Globalization (a new era of international economy and international relations after COVID-19) is materializing. With global living, international travel, and trade interconnected, businesses need to plan for handling the future outbreaks and their economic, as well as social, consequences. The aim of this paper is to draw the lessons for business and economic leaders in the post-COVID era with a focus on the new trends and challenges for the sustainable development and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The paper also presents an empirical model that assesses the novel ways of doing business and innovating using the sustainable economic practices after the COVID-19 pandemic. The model employs our own data collected from 450 managers and owners of small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in the Czech Republic and Russia. Our results show that innovation and digitalization (e.g., smart metering or the Internet of Things (IoT)) are becoming the main drivers of the sustainable economic transformation of small and medium enterprises in the post-pandemic period. These results might be useful for both academic researchers and business practitioners searching for new pathways for innovating their sustainable business practices and recreating their customer base in the post-COVID era. © 2023 by the authors.

[Peculiarities of hemostasis in patients with COVID-19].

AIM: Analysis of the dynamics of different stages of clot formation and its lysis in patients with different COVID-19 severity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively included 58 patients with COVID-19 (39 patients with moderate disease severity and 18 patients with severe disease) and 47 healthy volunteers as a control group. All participants underwent the assessment of flow-mediated dilation (FMD) of brachial artery, impedance aggregometry, rotational thromboelastometry and thrombodynamics. Von Willebrand factor antigen (vWF:Ag) quantification was also performed in patients with COVID-19. Measurements were repeated on the 3rd and 9th day of hospitalization. RESULTS: Compared to the control group, patients with COVID-19 showed reduced values of platelet aggregation and greater values of the clot growth rate, as well as its size and density. On the first day of hospitalization, we found no differences in the activity of plasma hemostasis and endogenous fibrinolysis between subgroups of patients. With the progression of the disease, the growth rate and size of the clot were higher in the severe subgroup, even despite higher doses of anticoagulants in this subgroup. An increase in platelet aggregation was noted during the progression of the disease, especially in the severe subgroup. There were no differences in the results of the FMD test by subgroups of patients. The vWF:Ag level was significantly higher in the severe subgroup. CONCLUSION: Thus, plasma hemostasis followed by secondary platelet activation correlates with the severity of COVID-19. Patients with moderate to severe coronavirus infection have predominantly local rather than generalized endothelial dysfunction.

Is endothelial dysfunction a driving force of COVID-19 induced coagulopathy?

Background/Introduction: There are numerous reports regarding the direct endothelial damage by the SARS-CoV-2 that can lead to activation of both plasma hemostasis and platelet aggregation. However, the mechanism of interaction between endothelium and haemostasis in COVID-19 remains unclear. Purpose: The aim of our study was to assess the relationship between each link of clot formation process (endothelial function, plasma coagulation, platelet aggregation) with the severity of the disease. Methods: 58 COVID-19 patients were included in our study. Patients were divided into moderate (n=39) and severe (n=18) subgroups. All patients underwent a flow-mediated dilation (FMD) test, impedance aggregation, rotational thromboelastometry, thrombodynamics and von Willebrand factor antigen (vWF: Ag) quantification. All measurements were repeated on days 3 (point 2) and 9 (point 3) of hospitalization. Results: COVID-19 patients demonstrated the enhanced plasma coagulation (clotting time, s 613,0 [480;820], clot growth rate, μm/min 32,75 [29,3;38,7]). At point 1 no significant difference in parameters of plasma coagulation between patients' subgroups was noted. At point 2 a significant decrease in the size (CS, μm 1278.0 [1216.5;1356.5] vs 965.0 [659.8;1098.0], p<0,01) and clot growth rate (μm/min 32,4 [29,2;35,0] vs 17,7 [10,3;24,4], p<0,01) under the influence of anticoagulants in the moderate subgroup compared with point 1 was observed. We didn't observe such phenomenon in severe subgroup. There was no significant difference in platelet aggregation between subgroups at point 1. During the course of the disease the patients in the moderate and severe subgroups demonstrated a significant increase in platelet aggregation induced by arachidonic acid and ADP (severe: AUC ARA 48,0 [25,0;59,0] vs 77,5 [55,8;92,7], p=0,04;AUC ADP 44,0 [41,0;56,0] vs 58,0 [45,5;69,0], p=0,04;moderate: AUC ARA 31,5 [19,8;50,7] vs 56,0 [39,0;76,0], p=0,01;AUC ADP 43,0 [20,0;59,0] vs 56,6 [50,3;70,5], p=0,04;), in moderate subgroup the significant increase in TRAP-induced aggregation was also noted (AUC TRAP 58,0 [41,0;69,5] vs 76,0 [58,3;81,5], p=0,048). There were no significant differences in the FMD-test results between the patient subgroups. FMD-test results were predominantly within the reference ranges (7,1 [4,0;8,8]). Patients in the severe subgroup had significantly higher levels of vWF: Ag (228,0 [205,3;240,7] vs 232,0 [226,0;423,0], p=0,03). Conclusion: SARS-CoV-2 infection was characterized by increased levels of vWF:Ag, that could represent the local endothelial damage, meanwhile there was no generalized endothelial dysfunction assessed via FMD-test in moderate to severe patients. At the same time the enhanced plasma coagulation in COVID-19 patients was observed.